ZapBounce vs Reoon
Reoon is cheaper than us at volume, resolves more Yahoo and accept-all addresses than most of this field, and gives you twenty free checks a day on top of the signup credits. We are writing this comparison knowing we lose several rows of it.
| ZapBounce | Reoon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy figure published | Coverage and accuracy together, once measured | Over 99% on mixed-quality lists |
| 1,000 addresses | $5 | Not listed separately |
| 10,000 addresses | $25 | $11.90 |
| 100,000 addresses | $139 | $116.40, and 1,000,000 for $960 |
| Free tier | 100 a month, no card | 20 a day plus 100 on signup |
| Credit expiry | Never | Instant credits never expire |
| Billed for unknowns | No | Not stated |
Reoon figures read from their own pricing page in September 2026.
How Reoon prices it
$11.90 for ten thousand, $116.40 for a hundred thousand, $960 at a million. They undercut us at volume and we are not going to pretend otherwise on our own comparison page.
Where Reoon is the better choice
Stated plainly, because a comparison page that never concedes anything is not worth reading.
- They resolve more Yahoo, Microsoft and catch-all addresses than most of the field, which is exactly the hard part.
- Their volume pricing is aggressive: $116.40 at 100,000 against our $139.
- A daily free allowance on top of the signup credits.
Where we differ
What ZapBounce does differently
- We report the unresolved share as a headline rather than a score.
- Our pricing is flat per tier with no separate charge for harder checks.
What you give up leaving Reoon
- They resolve more Yahoo, Microsoft and catch-all addresses than most of the field, which is exactly the hard part.
- Their volume pricing is aggressive: $116.40 at 100,000 against our $139.
- A daily free allowance on top of the signup credits.
Moving off Reoon
Not much, honestly. Reoon holds three advantages over us at once: $116.40 at a hundred thousand against our $139, a daily free allowance, and a reputation on cold-email forums for resolving Yahoo and catch-all cases others return as unknown.
Simple. The thing to check is whether their five-step score is wired into your segmentation, because a 0-to-100 number does not map cleanly onto four verdicts.
What Reoon cannot do either
Questions people ask about Reoon
Reoon is cheaper. Why would we switch?
On price alone, you would not, and $116.40 against $139 at a hundred thousand is the honest figure. The only real argument here is how each side reports the addresses it could not resolve: a confidence score, or a count.
Is a 0-to-100 score better than a verdict?
It carries more information and it is harder to audit. Somebody chose the threshold that turns 62 into a send and 58 into a hold, and that choice can move without you noticing. A count of unresolved addresses is blunter and it cannot drift.
Do they really resolve more Yahoo addresses?
That is their reputation on cold-email forums and we have not benchmarked it. When we publish our own numbers, this is one of the comparisons we expect to lose, and it will be in the results either way.
Is ZapBounce cheaper than Reoon?
At 100,000 addresses we list $139 and they list $116.40, and 1,000,000 for $960. Compare the per-address rate rather than the headline, and check what each side does with unknowns.
Can I test both before deciding?
Yes, and you should. Run the same sample of a few thousand addresses through each and compare how many came back unresolved. That difference matters more than either accuracy claim.
Reoon undercuts us at volume and resolves hard domains well. We lose both of those rows, and the one we hold is how the unresolved share gets reported.
Run the same sample through us and Reoon
100 free checks a month, no card, and the unknowns come back labeled.