ZapBounce vs MyEmailVerifier
Four vendors in this category served us a 403 or refused the connection outright when we tried to read their published terms, and MyEmailVerifier was the most thorough about it: their homepage refused us, not merely their pricing path. That is worth a page of its own, because bot protection on a pricing page is a choice with consequences for the buyer, and almost nobody discusses those consequences.
| ZapBounce | MyEmailVerifier | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy reporting | Coverage stated: the share of your list with a definite verdict | Not readable on their public pages |
| 1,000 addresses | $5 | See their pricing page |
| 10,000 addresses | $25 | See their pricing page |
| 100,000 addresses | $139 | See their pricing page |
| Free tier | 100 a month, no card | See their pricing page |
| Credit expiry | Never | See their pricing page |
| Billed for unknowns | No | Not stated |
MyEmailVerifier prices change, so confirm theirs on their own pricing page. Ours are fixed and published on /pricing.
How MyEmailVerifier prices it
Their site blocks automated reads, including the homepage, so this page quotes no figures for them. Open their pricing in a browser, then set it beside ZapBounce's ladder: $5 for 1,000, $25 for 10,000 and $139 for 100,000.
Why teams pick ZapBounce over MyEmailVerifier
What changes when your list runs through ZapBounce instead.
The short version
- Published prices on one page, from $5 for 1,000 to $949 for a million, readable by anyone.
- No charge for an unknown result or a repeated address, and that rule sits on the pricing page where anyone can read it.
- Credits never expire, so a balance bought for one list waits for the next.
- Coverage reported on every list: the share with a definite verdict, stated as a number.
- A free monthly allowance of 100 credits with no card, so a test run needs no purchase at all.
Moving off MyEmailVerifier
Usually a question about terms. Their site does not open to automated readers, so buyers comparing options often want a vendor whose prices, credit rules and unknowns policy can be read and quoted.
Bulk upload out, bulk upload in. Export the list as a CSV, run it through ZapBounce, and read four results with role, disposable and free_provider flags on every row.
The hard addresses, and how they come back
Questions people ask about MyEmailVerifier
Does bot protection on a pricing page hurt buyers?
It has one clear cost: nobody can build an independent comparison that includes you. Roundup sites fill the gap with figures scraped once and never refreshed, which is how a stale price ends up quoted across a dozen sites for years. A vendor that blocks readers does not stop being compared. It stops controlling the accuracy of the comparison.
Is a blocked site a red flag?
No, and we want to be plain about that. NeverBounce and Kickbox block automated reads too, and both are serious products with long histories. A firewall rule is an infrastructure decision made by someone who was not thinking about comparison pages.
How do we get a number we can trust?
Open their page in an ordinary browser, because a human request is served where an automated one is not. Or divide your own last invoice by the addresses it covered, which is better evidence anyway since it reflects whatever rate your account actually sits on.
Is ZapBounce cheaper than MyEmailVerifier?
Ours is $5 for 1,000 and $139 for 100,000, published, with no minimum. Credits never expire, and unknowns and duplicates are never billed, so the rate you see is the rate you pay.
Can I test both before deciding?
Yes, and you should. Run the same sample of a few thousand addresses through each and compare how many came back unresolved. That difference matters more than either accuracy claim.
Bring your own invoice. Divide it by the addresses it covered and set that rate beside ZapBounce's published ladder.
Run the same sample through us and MyEmailVerifier
100 free checks a month, no card, and the unknowns come back labeled.